Secret of the Samurai Sword

Secret of the Samurai Sword by Phyllis A. Whitney, 1958.

Before I explain the plot of this book, I’d like to point out some of the aspects of the book that make it interesting. The story takes place in Japan following World War II. The book wasn’t just written in the 1950s but set during that time (no exact year given, but the characters refer to the war as being “more than ten years ago”, putting it contemporary to the time when the book was written and published), and the war and its aftermath are important to the plot of the story. Although the main characters are American tourists, readers also get to hear the thoughts and feelings of people living in Japan after the war. The author, Phyllis A. Whitney actually born in Japan in 1903 because her father worked for an export business in Yokohama, and she spent much of her early life living in and traveling through Asia. Her parents gave her the middle name of Ayame, which means “Iris” in Japanese, although she had no Japanese ancestry. Her parents were originally from the United States, but the family did not return to the United States until Phyllis was 15 years old, following her father’s death in 1918. That means that Phyllis Whitney was very familiar with what Japan was like before both of the World Wars as well as after. She lived a very long life, passing away at age 104 in 2008, and she saw many major world events and changes through her life. I was interested in hearing how she viewed the effect of the World Wars, especially WWII, on Japan and its culture in this book. In the back of this book, there is a section where the author explains some of the background of her life and this story and her inspiration for writing it.

Celia and Stephen Bronson are American teenagers who are spending the summer in Japan with their grandmother, who is a travel writer, not long after the end of World War II. Celia and Stephen are really just getting to know their grandmother, whom they have not seen since they were very young (they don’t explain much about why, except that she travels a great deal) and don’t really remember, and she is getting to know them. Stephen’s passion in life is photography, and Celia likes to draw, although she doesn’t consider herself to be very good. Stephen is the older sibling, and he’s lively and outgoing, often doing the talking for Celia as well as himself because she’s quieter and less confident. Celia often hesitates to voice her opinions in Stephen’s presence because he jumps on her for things she says and shuts her down when she speaks. (Yeah, I’ve been there before, kiddo.) Stephen is often brash and insensitive, bluntly referring to his sister as “beautiful but dumb” right to her face and in public when she accidentally leaves one of their bags with some of his camera equipment behind at the hotel where they were staying in Tokyo. Celia is embarrassed at her mistake because she knows that sometimes her mind wanders and she doesn’t focus properly. Celia is a daydreamer. She feels bad that she does silly things sometimes, but she had hoped that this trip to Japan might help her and Stephen to be closer, more like they used to be when they were younger, before Stephen started getting so impatient and disapproving with her. However, Stephen’s about to get a little disapproval of his own. (And more from me later.) Stephen gets a rebuke from his grandmother for using the word “Japs” in the conversation because they are guests in Japan, and she won’t have him using “discourteous terms” for the people there. The kids’ grandmother says she’ll just write a note to the hotel, telling them where to forward the forgotten bag, and it’s not a big deal.

The kids and their grandmother, whom they call Gran, are not staying in Tokyo but renting a house in Kyoto. Gran knows her way around because she has been to Japan before, multiple times, and she can speak a little Japanese. Everything is new to Celia and Stephen, even the train trip to Kyoto, where their grandmother introduces them to the bento boxed lunches they can buy at the train station, which come beautifully wrapped with included chopsticks, and little clay teapots with green tea. (I love stories that include little pieces of cultural information like this. When they finish with their lunch boxes and pots of tea, they wrap them up and put them under the train seats to be collected by staff later.)

While they’re having lunch on the train, the kids’ grandmother tells them a little about the house she’s rented. It’s a very old house, and a Japanese family used to live there, but after WWII, the Occupation Army used it for a time and updated some parts of the house, so it’s an odd mixture of Japanese and Western style now. (Gran says that the house now includes a “real bathroom.” Here, I think what she’s really talking about are the toilets, not the baths. Americans don’t make a distinction between rooms for baths and rooms for toilets because our houses usually have both in the same room. In Japan, like in Britain, that’s not always the case. What I’m not sure about is whether she’s saying that the house didn’t originally have indoor plumbing because it was really old or if she’s just saying that the army changed the traditional squat toilets for western style ones. Either way, I think she’s trying to say that they can expect western style toilets, similar to what they have at home.) She also tells her grandchildren that the house is supposed to be haunted by a ghost in the garden. She thinks the prospect of a ghost sounds exciting and will make a nice addition to the book she’s writing. However, Stephen says that he doesn’t believe in ghosts. Celia hesitates to voice much of an opinion because she doesn’t want Stephen to jump all over her verbally again. Gran tells Stephen that people in Japan look at things like ghosts and spirits differently from people in the United States hints that he should keep more of an open mind.

The three of them discuss the bombings of Japan during WWII, and Gran explains that Kyoto wasn’t bombed, like Tokyo and Yokohama were. It’s a very historic city because it used to be the capital of Japan, and Gran is happy that the historic shrines and temples of the city survived the war. Celia admires the beautiful countryside and thinks about drawing it later. Although she said earlier that she would be happier if someone else saw the ghost instead of her, Celia thinks that an elegant Japanese lady ghost pining for a lost love in her garden would make a very romantic image. However, the ghost isn’t an elegant lady. It’s the ghost of a samurai, pierced with arrows, and he’s looking for his lost sword.

When they finally reach Kyoto, Celia is surprised by how modern it looks and how many people are wearing American style clothes instead of kimonos. Finding the house is a bit tricky because the houses don’t always have house numbers and not all of the streets have names. (This is true, although there is a system behind the lack of names and irregular numbering.) People stare at the Bronsons because they’re blond and stand out from everyone else as foreigners. At the house, they meet the maid, Tani, and the cook, Setsuko. Gran explains to the kids how they need to change their shoes when they enter the house and how the bedding in the bedrooms is folded and put away during the day. (Again, I really like the little pieces of information about daily life and culture.) Celia admires the garden of the house, but she notices a strange lump of concrete that seems oddly out of place. It turns out to be a bomb shelter, left over from the war. The door to the shelter is locked, so for much of the book, the characters are unable to look inside.

Then, Celia spots a Japanese girl from a nearby house watching her. She tries to say hello, but an elderly man discourages the girl from talking to Celia. However, a boy named Hiro stops by because he’s been studying English in school and would like to practice by talking to them. Hiro isn’t bad, but his pronunciation is off, partly because of the r/l sound that’s practically cliche in fiction. (The r/l confusion in Asians who speak English is based in reality, not just fiction. Many Asian languages, including Japanese have a sound that’s about halfway between ‘r’ and ‘l’, which causes confusion to English speakers, who are accustomed to those sounds being completely separate from each other. This is one of those books that spells things people say how they’re pronounced in order to convey accent, which I tend to find annoying. The way Hiro’s speech is conveyed seems to be pretty accurate for a beginning speaker of English who is accustomed to Japanese, including his mispronunciation of “baseball” as “beso-boru.” I’m not really fond of books that over-emphasize accents in writing because there are a lot of really corny jokes in old movies based on the r/l sound confusion, and they tend to overdo it and try to carry the jokes too far, but I’ll go easier on this particular book because it’s important to the story that Hiro is learning English pronunciation. I also appreciate that there are some Japanese words and phrases and their translations in the book, which is educational.) Stephen, always the rude one, picks on Hiro’s pronunciation while he’s visiting, and when he leaves, he calls him an “oddball.” Gran disapproves of Stephen’s attitude and tells him that Hiro might teach him “a few things.” Stephen does become friends with Hiro and some of Hiro’s friends, and Celia admires Stephen’s ability to make friends easily, but it occurs to me that might not be entirely due to Stephen’s friend-making abilities because his new friends also need the ability to tolerate him. (Mean people can be sociable and attract others because they’re self-confident, but rudeness is also trying, especially when you’re around it for long periods. Also, I’m pretty sure that Hiro doesn’t know what Stephen said about him behind his back.)

Celia tries to ask Tani about the ghost in the garden, but all Tani will tell her is that only her cat sees the ghost. Later that night, Celia wakes up and hears the sound of someone wearing wooden clogs walking around outside and music being played on a stringed instrument. Celia is too comfortable and too tired to get up, so she doesn’t see the ghost that night, but she believes that’s what she heard.

When Celia and Stephen are allowed to do some exploring on their own, Celia meets the Japanese girl she saw before and learns that she’s actually American, too. Sumiko Sato’s parents were born in Japan, but she was born in San Francisco and only arrived in Japan the month before to stay with her grandfather. Sumiko doesn’t think of herself as being Japanese, although she speaks the language. Her grandfather, Gentaro Sato, is a famous artist, but he is also an old-fashioned man who doesn’t like Americans, partly because of the destruction from the war. Sumiko is Hiro’s cousin, and Sumiko is a little angry that her grandfather allowed Hiro to go talk to the Americans the other day to practice his English but wouldn’t allow her to go when she’s really an American who speaks fluent English. She says that it’s part of her grandfather’s old-fashioned attitudes and because Hiro is a boy. Apparently, boys are allowed more freedom than girls in Japan. Since she and her mother came to Japan after her father died, Gentaro has been trying to teach his granddaughter to be a proper Japanese girl, but Sumiko is used to living as an American and hates it that her grandfather wants to mold her into being something else. She also says that the other girls in the area don’t accept her because they know that she’s an American who doesn’t fit in. Sumiko doesn’t even care for her grandfather’s traditional style of art, which only has nature themes and no people. She likes the pictures Celia draws with people in them. She wishes that they’d stayed in San Francisco because she really wants to go to the university in Berkeley, where Celia and her brother live, but her mother missed Japan, and Sumiko is only 14, the same age as Celia, too young to stay in the US by herself. Celia sympathizes with how Sumiko seems caught between two cultures, but she’s grateful that Sumiko is there because she could really use a friend this summer. Really, both of them could use a friend who speaks their language, in more ways than one. Celia asks Sumiko if she knows anything about the ghost that’s supposed to haunt their house. Sumiko says that her grandfather has seen it, but she refuses to believe in it until she sees it herself.

Celia’s first knowledge of the lore of the samurai who is supposed to haunt their garden comes when she and her grandmother are looking at prints of Gentaro Sato’s work in a shop. The shop owner also has a painting by Gentaro Sato that he did in his youth, when he did paint pictures of humans. The picture is of an ancestor of the Sato family, a samurai who died bravely in battle. It’s a frightening image but a powerful one. Later, when they see Sumiko at a shopping center with her younger cousins, and they ask her about the samurai painting. Sumiko says that people in her family talk about the painting, but she’s never actually seen it herself because her grandfather gave it away years ago, although the family wishes that he hadn’t. Gentaro said that he just couldn’t bear to have it in the house anymore. After the war ended badly for Japan and his eldest son (Hiro’s father, not Sumiko’s) died, Gentaro was greatly depressed. It turns out that Hiro’s father didn’t just die but committed suicide along with his commanding officer at the end of the war because they felt like the defeat of Japan was a personal dishonor for them as soldiers. At least, Hiro’s father’s captain felt that way, and Hiro’s father killed himself out of loyalty to him. (Japanese soldiers in real were known to have killed themselves in various ways at the end of the war. Some committed suicide as individuals and some in large groups, and some in last-ditch battles. Even civilians killed themselves and even family members for fear of how they might be treated by an occupying American army. The war’s deaths didn’t end with the war itself.) That means that Hiro’s father’s death was a direct result of the defeat of Japan. The Sato family said that, after that, Gentaro sat and stared at the samurai painting for days until, one day, he couldn’t stand to see it anymore. Now, he doesn’t even like talking about it. During an English language practice session with the Bronson family, Hiro further explains that, while Gentaro hadn’t wanted Japan to enter the war in the first place, he was even more shocked when Japan lost because he always thought that the gods favored Japan and wouldn’t allow the country to be defeated. The defeat shook his confidence in everything he thought he knew and believed in.

Even though it’s been more than ten years since the war ended, the memory of the losses and destruction of the war is still strong, and Gentaro still struggles with his feelings about it. He gave up drawing and painting people and samurai for his nature drawings because he wanted to get as far from the themes of war as possible. All of this ties directly with the house the Bronsons have rented because the Sato family originally owned the house. They were forced to sell it to the Occupation Army because they badly needed money after the war, and they moved to a smaller house nearby, just another loss from the war for Gentaro to mourn. When Celia and Sumiko take doll-making lessons together, their teacher, Mrs. Nomura, who has known the Sato family for a long time, tells them things that even Sumiko hasn’t heard from her family. Apparently, before Hiro’s father killed himself, he hid the sword that his samurai ancestors kept for generations because he didn’t want the occupation forces to find it. (It was a valid concern. Although Sumiko points out that American soldiers wouldn’t take the sword to use against Japan as her grandfather initially feared because most Americans, even soldiers, don’t know how to fight with swords, some US soldiers were known to take weapons and other objects they found as “souvenirs” or war booty.) Gentaro originally told his son to destroy the sword to keep it out of enemy hands, but no one knows whether he did or not. However, metal swords are very difficult to destroy, so people think he might have just hidden it somewhere.

The ghost that haunts the house and garden is the samurai from Gentaro’s painting, even including the arrows piercing his body. Celia does eventually see him, even noting that he doesn’t have his sword with him, like he did in the painting. Strangely, Gentaro actually seems happy whenever he sees the ghost. He thinks the ghost is trying to tell him something, although he worries because he can’t figure out what the ghost wants and thinks that he might not be able to provide it. Why does the ghost appear in the garden at night? Or, perhaps a better question, why would someone want to make it seem like a ghostly samurai is haunting the garden? Is someone really trying to send a message to Gentaro? And, what did Hiro’s father really do with the sword years ago?

My Reaction

The Mystery

I’ve read other books by this same author, so I know that she wrote mysteries, not ghost stories. I knew from the beginning that the ghost wasn’t really a ghost. I was pretty sure, for about half the book that I knew who the “ghost” was going to be because there was one really obvious place for the “ghost” to get his costume, but I wasn’t completely sure, and I also couldn’t figure out the motive. The missing sword is at the center of the mystery, but I wasn’t sure why someone would play ghost to find it. I mean, the ghost act does allow someone to enter the garden without permission without being recognized, but when Celia and Stephen see the ghost, the ghost doesn’t really seem to be actively searching for anything. The “ghost” seemed to be meant to be seen by other people, but I couldn’t figure out why or what that was supposed to accomplish.

As it turns out, I was only partially right with my first theory. I was right about where the costume came from, but not who was wearing it. I had rejected one of the characters as a possibility because this person was accounted for during one of the ghost sightings, but this person had a little help to establish an alibi. The ghost stunt wasn’t meant to upset Gentaro but to help him to let go of the past by staging a conclusion to a family tragedy in order to help Gentaro to regard the situation as resolved. The “ghost” had a final act to the drama in mind when Celia’s investigation interfered, but it all turns out for the best because Celia realizes where the missing sword must be. In the end, they don’t tell Gentaro the whole truth because the “ghost” deception would upset him, but when they return the sword to him, he is able to believe that the spirit of the samurai is now at rest. The sword was not destroyed, but Hiro’s father did manage to break the blade in half in order to render it unusable to anyone who might find it. Gentaro regards the broken blade as a fitting metaphor for the end of the war and, hopefully, the beginning of a more peaceful future.

The mystery is good, and the nighttime sightings of the ghost are fun and creepy, but much of the emphasis in this story is on the characters, their relationships with each other, and the history and culture of Japan.

Japanese Culture

I’m not an expert on Japanese culture, although I know a little about Japanese history. The author of this book actually lived in Japan during her youth, and she later returned to visit, so this is a subject near and dear to her heart. The book is full of explanations of daily life and culture in Japan, more than I even mentioned above. The characters visit some famous landmarks and collect stamps in their stamp books to mark places they’ve been. I also enjoyed the scene where Celia watches Gentaro as he pays his respects to a local shrine. The rituals Gentaro observes at the shrine resemble the ones described in this video for the benefit of tourists visiting Japan. The kids also visit a Japanese movie studio with their friends because Hiro and Sumiko’s uncle is an actor, and Hiro gets a part as an extra in a movie. The book ends around the time of some Japanese festivals that honor the dead, which is fitting.

The books seems pretty accurate on history and culture, but I can’t vouch for everything the author says, both because I haven’t lived in Japan myself and because the book takes place more than 60 years ago, so some things may have changed since then. Sumiko makes some comments about Japanese family life and family dynamics during the course of the story, and I don’t know if all of them still apply or if some of them even really applied to families other than Sumiko’s. There’s probably at least some basis for what she says about how girls are treated differently from boys and how discipline of young children works, but I’m just not sure to what extent Sumiko’s experiences reflect real life because family dynamics can be personal among families. There may be some general trends in these areas, but actual results may vary or change with time.

If you’d like to see some street scenes of Tokyo during the 1910s, when the author lived in Japan as a girl, for an idea of how Japan looked to her at the time, I recommend this video (colorized and with ambient sound added because it was originally silent). There are also videos that show Japan in the 1950s (with added music) and part of a documentary about family life in Japan during the early 1960s (which discusses how Japanese culture and clothing became more Westernized after the war) to give you an idea of what the author might have seen on her return visit to Japan and how Japan might have looked to the characters in the book. Again, these are just brief glimpses, and actual results may vary in real life, but I did like that the 1960s documentary shows what a Japanese house of the era looks like because that’s important to this story. It also shows scenes from a children’s art class, which is also appropriate to the story. This video from 1962 shows scenes in Kyoto and Nara which include a print shop and a temple, which are also places the characters in the story visit. For a look at modern 21st century life in Japan, I recommend the YouTube channels Life Where I’m From and, which are in English and designed to be educational for visitors to Japan. In particular, the Life Where I’m From channel includes this video, which shows and explains old townhouses in Kyoto, which can help you further understand the types of homes in the story.

The War

Since the book takes place during the 1950s, the focus is on the end of World War II and what happened immediately after. If you want to know more about how the war started (a lot of it had to do with resources as well as the state of international affairs following WWI), how Japan entered the war, what led up to the attack on Pearl Harbor, and how the US became involved, I can suggest the videos I’ve linked in this sentence for some brief explanations with historical footage. I particularly like the ending to the CrashCourse video that briefly explains WWII, where the host talks about the aftermath of the war and the development of nuclear weapons, explaining that, “the opportunity of studying history is the opportunity to experience empathy. Now, of course, we’re never going to know what it’s like to be someone else, to have your life saved or taken by decisions made by the Allied command. Studying history and making genuine attempts at empathy helps us to grapple with the complexity of the world, not as we wish it were, but as we find it.” I think this fictional mystery story captures some of that sentiment. What happened at the end of the war wasn’t happy. It was good that the war was over, but Japan was in a bad state, and its people were in a bad situation. The characters in this story have to acknowledge that and come to terms with it, and empathy is one of the tools they use to do it.

It helps to remember that the original audience for this book was American children about the age of the child characters in the story, who were probably too young to remember the war themselves and were dependent on their elders to tell them what happened. The book was meant to explain some of the Japanese perspective and encourage empathy. The author notes in the back of the book that she consulted with some Japanese friends about the aspects of Japanese culture included in the book. It’s worth pointing out that Americans and Japanese have different memories of the war because, while both countries experienced trauma from it, the parts that caused each country the worst trauma were different. For Americans of the time, the beginning of the war and Pearl Harbor were the most traumatic parts, and for the Japanese, the end of the war, the atomic bombs, and the suffering that came immediately after the end of the war were the most traumatic. All of those events were part of the war, and they were all bad, but some parts were worse for some people than others, and that influenced how they all felt afterward. It’s worth keeping that in mind because it explains how different characters in the story feel and how they approach the subject and also what the author is trying to point out to the American children reading the book.

Because this book was intended for a young audience, probably kids in their tweens (pre-teens) or early teens, it doesn’t go into gory detail about all of the horrors of war, but there’s enough here to give a realistic impression of genuine suffering. For example, we know that Hiro’s father committed suicide with his commanding officer after the war, but the book doesn’t explain the method he used to do that. It’s left to the imagination. (Hiro’s father didn’t use his family’s sword for that or it would have been found with his body, but that’s all we really know.) Readers are invited to empathize with the characters about what they’ve endured as well as what they’re continuing to go through. Celia empathizes with Gentaro when she learns what he and his family suffered because of the war, although she still thinks that it’s a little unreasonable for him to still hate all Americans because he now has a granddaughter who counts as an American by birth and upbringing and Celia’s family wants to be friends. Celia follows her grandmother’s attitude that the war ended more than ten years ago, and it’s time to move on and build a new future. Of course, that’s easier to say when you’re not the one whose life was shattered and completely changed by the war. Gentaro has had some time to work through some of his feelings about what’s happened, but the damage done to his family is serious and lasting, and the truth is that nothing will ever be the same for them again. The characters have to acknowledge and accept some of the grim realities of the past before they can move on.

I was surprised that the book never mentioned Japanese internment camps in the US during WWII because I would have expected that to have an effect on Sumiko and her attitudes about being an American, but I suppose we’re meant to assume that her family wasn’t among those sent to the camps. Of course, this is more than ten years after the war, and since Sumiko is fourteen, she was probably very young during the war and wouldn’t have much of a memory of that time.

I’ve talked somewhat about how Sato’s family was affected by the war and their thoughts about it, but there’s much more detail about that in the book. The book doesn’t shy away from talking about the atomic bombs dropped on Japan. The characters in the story don’t visit Hiroshima in the book, but at one point, the subject comes up when Celia and Hiro have an honest talk about what the missing sword means to the Sato family. Hiro describes the museum and monument at Hiroshima to explain how his family feels about the nature of war. The sword is no longer a symbol of war to them but his family’s connection to the past and their ancestors. Gentaro wants it back because he thinks the ghost is his samurai ancestor, searching for the sword because it’s lost, and he gets upset because he can’t return the sword to this spirit. (That’s not what’s happening, but that’s what Gentaro thinks at first.) Celia is moved to tears at what Hiro tells her about Hiroshima and how both Americans and Japanese go there to mourn and pay their respects and there is “no resentment left against those who had dropped the bomb.” (I’m not sure that there is “no resentment” at all because people like Gentaro are still struggling with their feelings, and that’s completely understandable, but the story is focusing on how people were coming to terms with what happened in a form of sad acceptance.) Hiro quotes the words on the monument, “Sleep undisturbed, for we shall not repeat this error,”, adding “Japan makes error. America makes error. But these words do not mean to apologize for wrong. By ‘we’ monument means mankind. It is man who must never make error again.” It’s a broad statement against war itself, and this is the sort of sentiment the author is encouraging the readers to have, reflecting on what war does to people, even just ordinary families, letting them feel for others, and consider what they really want for the future.

The bright side is that, although there were dark times in the recent past and everything has changed for the Sato family, not every change has to be a bad one. With the help of the young people in the story, Gentaro begins to see that there is new life and hope for the future. Even though they don’t speak the same language and have to communicate through a translator, Gentaro bonds with Celia over their shared love of art and the beauty of nature. Celia is quiet, shy, and observant, very unlike the loud and rough Americans Gentaro has seen before (including her brother). Gentaro begins to realize that not all Americans are alike, and some can be kindred spirits. Similarly, not all Japanese girls are really alike, and Sumiko is just a different kind of Japanese girl. Gentaro realizes that he has to take people as he finds them, even his own complex and seemingly incongruous granddaughter. Sumiko has some soul-searching of her own to do before she and her grandfather finally have a heart-to-heart talk, but their interactions with the American family put their relationship into a new light. Gentaro’s life isn’t what he once thought it would be, but this is the life he has now, and not all of it is bad. Sumiko isn’t the granddaughter he would have expected, but she’s also one he has, and she’s not bad, either. Gentaro also realizes that Celia has some good qualities that she could use to be a good influence on his granddaughter, especially her ability to see the beauty in things around her and communicate it to other people. Celia is very perceptive, and Gentaro recognizes it. Although Sumiko has been resisting traditional Japanese culture because it’s unfamiliar and uncomfortable to her and she thinks that even the people in her own family don’t like her, she begins to appreciate the beauty of traditional Japanese arts through Celia’s appreciation for them. Celia also helps her to see a different side of her family. Because Celia can bond with Gentaro over their shared love of art, Sumiko realizes that she also values her grandfather and admires his art and begins to bond with him by learning how to show her interest and appreciation. When Gentaro draws a picture for Celia, Sumiko tells her that he’s never drawn a picture for her, so Celia tells Sumiko to ask her grandfather for a picture so he’ll know that she wants one and will value what he gives her. Gentaro’s appreciation for Celia also helps her to resolve some problems in her own life.

The story works on a small scale, focusing on one American family and their interactions with a Japanese family and seeing how they can help each other and find some common ground. However, you might be wondering what was going on in the bigger picture at this time. As the author explains in the section in the back where she talks about her own travels in Japan, there were American tourists going to Japan and seeing and doing things very much like what the characters in the book do. Americans could safely visit Japan in the 1950s and receive hospitality, although the war was still in everyone’s mind, and there were lingering feelings about it. The fact that, when the book takes place, more than ten years have passed since the end of the war helps. The children in the story were either very young when it was still happening or weren’t born at all, so they don’t remember the war themselves the way their parents and grandparents do. Also, there are two other factors that are worth addressing here although they aren’t fully addressed in the book.

The first is that, in the face of the devastation of the war and the hardships that came after, many people developed a kind of stoicism, a sense that that situation simply “couldn’t be helped” because it was all just a part of the nature of war and that the best thing to do was to try to go on with life as best they could afterward, rebuilding their cities and their lives. They didn’t like what happened (to put it mildly), but they accepted circumstances for what they were. There was still plenty to justifiably complain about, but the focus shifted to doing something about building the future, which is empowering. This mindset also helped people in Japan to shift the blame for the results of the war away from the soldiers who engaged in it and onto the concept of war itself, a sentiment that is reflected in the story. As Hiro puts it when he’s describing the monument at Hiroshima to Celia, “But no more enemy. Only war is enemy. Enemy of all people.”

The second factor is that the US learned something from the end of WWI. Part of the reason why WWII happened was that Germany was left in a bad state with a crippled economy after the end of WWI and a lot of resentment for those who had left it in that condition, those who blamed Germany for the entire war. As WWII came to an end, the US didn’t want to leave Japan in a similar condition, setting up further suffering and resentment that might erupt in revenge later, and they also hoped to shift the cultural focus of Japan away from some of the imperialistic and nationalistic feelings that helped fuel Japan’s involvement in the war. (Gentaro and his son’s despair at Japan’s loss of the war was partly based on what they had always believed about their government and leadership and what victory and loss would mean, and that’s an example of the sort of thinking that the US wanted to discourage during the rebuilding process, to redirect attention from the war and defeat mindsets. In real life, there were more complicated and controversial factors, of course, relating to political and economic structures, but this is the sort of reference to mindsets that enters this particular story. They’re pointing out that the defeat of Japan in the war doesn’t really mean what Gentaro and his son originally thought it meant for Japan’s future and even the future of the Sato family.) So the US government made it their business to contribute to the rebuilding of Japan, starting almost immediately after the end of the war. Being an occupied country after a war is never a great thing, and there was an admitted element of self-interest in the efforts the US made (fighting Japan once was a horrible nightmare, so they were ready to do things that would make that less likely to occur a second time, plus Japan also proved helpful in providing bases for US troops as the Korean War started) and perhaps a lingering sense of guilt over the use of atomic weapons, but the ability and willingness to take some responsibility and back it up with both work and money is worth something.

The book takes a rather optimistic view of the US occupation of Japan after the war, probably more than it really deserves. For example, Gran and Stephen both discount the possibility that US soldiers would take anything that didn’t belong to them as souvenirs, but they were known to do that in real life. They don’t even touch on some of the darker the subjects, like rape and prostitution, because this is a book for kids, but those were realities as well. In real life, post-war recovery was a long, hard effort with a lot of problems and mistrust along the way, but as time went on, the efforts helped because the people involved were willing to continue putting in the work even though it was difficult, people didn’t do everything right, and things weren’t always working well. So, the US did cause immense destruction to Japan but the fact that they stayed to become rebuilders after the war probably made a big difference in the long term relationship between the two countries. The US couldn’t bring back the dead, but in the end, they did do something to help the living. By the time the American Occupation ended in 1952, just seven years after the end of the war, Japan was on a much better footing, economically sound enough to begin operating independently again, albeit with some continuing military restrictions.

Tourists to Japan helped bring in additional sources of business and revenue, and when tourists were genuinely interested in the history and culture of Japan, as the characters in the story are, they made pleasant visitors. Probably, these positive interactions helped smooth over some of the bad and bitter feelings from the war and dissolve some prejudices on both sides. Real life is complex and messy, but the book emphasizes these types of positive interactions and the feelings of understanding they can produce. The author showed her young readers that not all Japanese are scary soldiers, like the ones who attacked Pearl Harbor; some are artists who create beautiful things and love nature, like Gentaro, and some are kids, like Sumiko and Hiro, who are much like the kids who originally read this book and can be friends. Also, if Americans can go to places like Hiroshima and face the past, showing real feelings like sorrow and remorse, and they can also appreciate the good parts of Japanese culture with respect and genuine interest, maybe they’re not so bad and scary, either. This is the way the author wants her readers to behave and to look at other people.

Gradually, the US and Japan developed a sense of mutual respect, which improved over time. It can’t be said that it’s a completely perfect relationship because nothing on Earth ever is completely perfect, but it’s a very good relationship in modern times, especially considering what it started from. (Actually, way before WWII and the atomic bombs, the first interactions that the US had with Japan in the 19th century were also pretty rocky, such as when Matthew Perry sailed there in 1853 and told isolationist Japan that they had better open up for trade or he would open fire. That’s one way to make a first impression.) The improvement came largely because the people involved cared enough to work for the improvement. The way things happened wasn’t always good, and sometimes, it was about as bad as it could get, but people took what they had and made it better, and that’s what makes a relationship worth something.

Theme of Respect

Speaking of relationships that are based on mutual respect (and even more about those that aren’t), I found the character of Stephen in the story really annoying, and if you’ve read other reviews of mine where I complain about characters like him, you can probably guess why. He is rude and inconsiderate and occasionally downright nasty. One of Stephen’s functions in the story is to be an example of ways not to behave, and that means that readers have to watch him do things that are annoying and cringe-inducing. The other way he functions is to provide a reason for Celia to want to prove her intelligence in spite of his criticism that she’s “dumb.” He’s kind of a negative force, moving the situation forward, not because he does much to help it, but because Celia wants to prove that she’s not as dumb as he thinks she is and earn his respect. I understand the points the author wants to make with Stephen, but putting up with him along the way isn’t fun. What I have to say about Stephen largely about the issue of respect, which is a theme that runs through the book.

To begin with, although Stephen is outgoing, and that helps him to make friends with some of the Japanese boys, including Hiro, but Stephen really isn’t a very respectful visitor in Japan. He starts off the trip using the word “Japs” freely on the train until his grandmother stops him. He laughs at Hiro and calls him an “oddball” behind his back for the way he speaks when Hiro knows more English than Stephen does Japanese. When they visit a temple, Stephen openly laughs at one of the worshipers because he thinks something the man does looks silly. Stephen is the kind of American tourist who gives other tourists a bad name, embarrassing us all. Perhaps I might feel differently if he was ten or twelve or younger, but he’s fifteen years old. That’s one year away from driving and three years away from college and registering for the draft, even back then. The older someone is, the worse it is when they act that way, like they don’t have a clue. When you’re in high school, you’re old enough not to behave like a little kid who doesn’t know that he’s supposed to sit still and not to use potty words in church. When they first start talking about going to the temple, Stephen gives Celia a funny look like he’s thinking, “that if he took her along she’d do something foolish so that he’d be sorry she was there,” but Stephen is the one who does offensive things. He’s worse than Celia’s occasional accidental clumsiness because he’s mean. I partly blame his parents and grandmother for that. He’s got this entitlement attitude, like everyone else has to think of him first and like he can do anything he wants while he jumps all over his sister for every little thing, and I think it’s because his parents issue corrections to Celia that they just don’t with him, no matter what he does. He thinks that he’s great and can do no wrong.

Stephen’s grandmother does correct him sometimes. When he laughs at the man at the temple, she says, “Don’t forget that the things we do seem every bit as funny to the Japanese, but they are at least polite enough not to laugh in our faces.” That’s a large part of Stephen’s problem – his sneering contempt for other people that he thinks is funny and his complete inability to figure out how others feel even when they actively tell him. Basically, Stephen is an arrogant brat. He doesn’t know how to have genuine respect for others and appreciate things they do, or at least, he’s quick to show disrespect because he thinks it’s cool and funny. His behavior forces other people to exercise more self control because he won’t control himself. Worse, while the grandmother has an honest talk with both Celia and Sumiko about their problems, she seems to have a “boys will be boys” attitude about Stephen and doesn’t tell him much. From what Celia says, it sounds like her parents are the same way. Yeah, I’m sure that boys are boys, but that’s only to the point where they’re legally men. While we’re at it, adults are adults, and I’d like to see a bit more adulting going on here from the people who are supposed to raising Stephen. Gran lets the kids roam around town and famous sites by themselves, and I wouldn’t feel comfortable doing that if I didn’t have confidence that they could be trusted to behave themselves unsupervised. If I were in charge of these kids, and I knew that I had a boy like Stephen, I’d prime him for certain situations, telling him ahead of time, in no uncertain terms, what I expect and what’s going to happen if he doesn’t follow through, but if Gran ever has a serious talk with Stephen beyond a mild rebuke a couple of times, we don’t see it. No preemptive talks or warnings like the kind I would have gotten as a kid. I also wish the grandmother had had an honest talk with Stephen about the way he treats his sister.

Celia’s feelings about her brother are a major part of her character and the conflicts she feels in the story. When she was little, she admired her older brother because it seemed like he knew so much and could do everything so well, and she felt like she wasn’t as good. She still admires him, but having respect for Stephen hasn’t caused Stephen to have any respect for her in return. This is the source of the problems between them. As the story continues, Celia still wants his respect, but she gets more and more fed up with her brother’s attitude and disrespect for her, picking at every little thing she does or likes or thinks or says and insisting on calling her “beautiful but dumb,” even when things that happen aren’t her fault and she apologizes anyway to placate him. Her self-esteem is a little low because of the way he picks at her and repeatedly calls her dumb, but at the same she realizes that she isn’t really dumb and that there are things that she actually understands certain things better than he does. He belittles painting as a skill to his sister, knowing that it’s something she likes to do, because photographs are more accurate at capturing what a subject really looks like, not appreciating the talent that it takes to make a painting and convey a feeling through it. Stephen doesn’t have a clue about anyone’s feelings. When Celia gets fed up with him for his rudeness to her when a picture she was trying to take for him is messed up because she was accidentally startled by a car horn, he can’t understand why Celia is irritated with his rudeness because, as far as he’s concerned, he’s the only one who’s entitled to have feelings. “Why should you be mad? You’re the one who spoiled the picture for me.” Yeah, and you’re the one who spoiled the day for her because you’re rude, self-centered, and inconsiderate, Stephen, and you’ve been that way for this whole trip. Maybe look in the mirror once in awhile and listen to yourself talk.

Gran sees Stephen’s arrogance, negativity, and disrespect. At one point, she suggests that the children take a class in something and learn a skill in Japan that they wouldn’t be able to learn at home. Stephen becomes interested in learning judo, and Gran suggests that Celia learn to make a doll after they admire some in a shop. When she sees Stephen shaking his head over the doll-making, Gran tells him, “Never mind. We’ll be polite and not tell you what we girls think of judo.” It’s a reminder that Stephen doesn’t have to like everything, but he should be polite enough to allow others to like what they like and not ruin things for them just to make himself feel bigger and better. Gran characterizes Stephen more as being thoughtless and teasing than intentionally mean toward his sister, but I don’t think that’s quite accurate. Calling someone “dumb” repeatedly, even when you can tell it’s making them mad, isn’t affectionate teasing; that’s just a direct insult. I’m not fond of any kind of teasing in general, but thoughtless but affectionate teasing would be more like someone joking around and giving someone a cutesy but embarrassing nickname, like calling a short person “munchkin” or something. When you’re just nitpicking someone to death and calling them dumb, you’re just nitpicking them to death and calling them dumb. It’s much more straightforward. Actually, I’m personally creeped out by the “beautiful but dumb” comments Stephen keeps making. Referencing his sister’s attractiveness while simultaneously telling her that she isn’t worth anything is a really weird thing for a brother to do. It’s not only really harmful to her self esteem, because Celia semi-believes what Stephen keeps telling her (and Gran openly acknowledges that), but it’s also pretty gross when you begin to think about what he’s really saying, implying that she’s a girl who’s “only good for one thing” and doesn’t need to be respected. I doubt that Stephen really means it that way, but I think he’s such a dang arrogant idiot that he hasn’t got a clue what he really means about anything. He has contempt for other people, so I have contempt for him.

Gran sees all of this as a phase that Stephen will get over someday. She says that he’s not thinking about Celia’s feelings because he’s too busy thinking about other things right now, but deep down, he really realizes that she’s a good sister. I don’t see it that way. I don’t think people just magically grow out of anything and that they need to have things spelled out for them because most people aren’t good at guessing why something they’re doing is bothering someone. I wish that Gran had told Celia that she can turn down things that Stephen asks her to do if he’s not appreciative of her efforts. Trying to help him is a thankless chore that exposes her to ridicule, and I don’t think anyone should be obligated to put up with that. Tell him, “If you want something done right, do it yourself!” Then, stand back and watch Stephen take some responsibility for himself. When someone’s taking you for granted, one of the best ways to stop it is to say “no” to them once in a while, and that’s a life skill that can help Celia in other ways as well. Respect is a taught skill, and Stephen’s not being taught. His grandmother speaks up when he says something culturally offensive but never tries to put a stop to his disrespectful treatment of his sister, even when he does it right in front of his grandmother. Gran is completely and totally aware of the situation, and she does nothing because Stephen is a boy and he’s at that “teasing” age, and that really bothers me. At the end of the story, when Stephen finally tells Celia that she’s smart for figuring out the mystery and Celia is surprised that he gave her any credit for what she did, Gran just says, “What a funny one you are. Don’t you know that he has always thought you were plenty smart? But he’d feel foolish showing it. Boys are like that.” Why no, Celia didn’t realize that Stephen had anything nice to say because he usually doesn’t, and if it’s so embarrassing for him to say that Celia is “smart”, he could just say nothing at all or at least cut out the creepy “beautiful but dumb” stuff. Celia isn’t “funny”; Stephen is weird and inappropriate. That’s not okay, Gran. It’s not okay at all, and I have a song for you. Someone should point out to Stephen how he sounds to other people and enforce some behavior standards. Gran also needs to have a second think or three because I don’t like the lessons she’s teaching Celia. I don’t care if Stephen is happy about getting some discipline or not because, when you’re responsible for a child, you have to do what’s best and teach them what they need to know. You can’t always be the boys’ best friend, and Gran also has a responsibility to Celia and needs to make sure that she knows how to speak up for the respect she deserves and not let someone put her down and push her around. We all teach other people how to treat us, and Stephen needs fewer allowances and more very direct lessons about respect of the sort that Gran gives to Sumiko.

I thought it was interesting that each of the grandparents in the story helps the other’s granddaughter. Gentaro helps Celia by pointing out her strengths – her eye for detail as an artist and perceptiveness of feelings, which she uses in solving the mystery and improving her self-esteem. Gran helps Sumiko by pointing out that some of her problems are rooted in her own behavior. Sumiko explains that she really envies Celia because she’s blonde and pretty and nobody would ever question whether she was a “real” American or not. Sumiko is under a terrible pressure because she is caught between cultures. Stephen refers to her as “neither fish nor fowl“, indicating a person who doesn’t seem to belong anywhere or in any particular category, and Gran tells him that’s not right – Sumiko is both American and Japanese at once, equally part of two groups at the same time, and that’s more difficult. Sumiko says that people might chuckle a little when Celia and the other Americans make a mistake, but it’s a tolerant kind of amusement because they’re obvious foreigners who aren’t expected to know better. It’s different with Sumiko because of her Japanese ancestry and family. She looks Japanese, so people expect her to already know all of the cultural rules in Japan, but she doesn’t because she didn’t live there until recently, and there are things no one has told her yet. People get impatient with Sumiko and expect her to know things that no one has explained to her, like teachers who test on material that wasn’t covered in class. (I told you that preemptive warnings are a good idea. They clear up a lot of misunderstandings.) People can be condescending when Sumiko doesn’t know the answers and does the wrong thing. This attitude isn’t endearing Sumiko to life and people in Japan. From her perspective, it’s like she’s expected to constantly please people who are both impossible to please and who don’t seem to appreciate her efforts or care about her feelings. Sumiko wants to give up trying and just go back to America. It’s a situation that somewhat mirrors Celia’s situation with Stephen, trying to please someone who apparently won’t be pleased, but while the brother and sister issues are based in Stephen’s thoughtlessness and disrespect and Celia’s lack of self-confidence, Sumiko feels more like her troubles are an inherent problem with who she is because of who her family is and where she was born and raised. Gran understands the awkwardness and tells Sumiko that there’s nothing wrong with who she is, but there is something wrong with her behavior – the same thing that I wish she had said to Stephen.

Gran points out to Sumiko that her own attitude is part of the problem. She hasn’t really been trying to bond with her Japanese relatives, and she actually shows them some of the condescension that she says they show her. When Sumiko begins ridiculing her grandfather for being superstitious during the Bon Festival (which seems somewhat like Dia de Los Muertos, where people pay respects to the dead and families believe that deceased loved ones return for a visit), talking to his dead sons as if they had really returned, Gran points out that Americans actually have a similar belief that those who love us never really leave us. Gran herself still speaks to her deceased husband about things that are happening in her life and sometimes feels like he answers her because she knew him so well that she can imagine what he would say to her. What Gentaro is doing isn’t really so different, and Gran can understand that because she is in a similar phase of her life as a grandparent and has similar feelings. Sumiko feels like she can’t talk to or connect with her family because they don’t understand her. Only her father seemed to, and he’s gone. However, Gran tells her that she can still talk to her father, and if she’s honest with herself, she can probably imagine what he would tell her in return.

Gran also tells Sumiko that she has known other Japanese people who were born in the United States (“nisei” as they call them), and being born in American doesn’t mean that she can’t also be Japanese. The difference between her and the other nisei that Gran has known is that Sumiko is fighting against the very things that would lead to her acceptance. From the beginning, Sumiko has thought that everyone is judging her harshly because of where she was born and how American she is, and she says that everyone thinks that she’s really stuck up, but Gran points out to her that it’s partly because she behaves that way. Sumiko was so sure that everyone would reject her that she’s been trying hard to reject every piece of Japanese culture and family heritage that her family has been trying to share with her. She ridicules things they tell her as silly or “superstitious.” When she goes to buy some flowers and accidentally buys the type that people put on graves because she doesn’t know better, her family has her start to take flower arranging lessons so she can learn something about it, but she hates the hates the lessons. Sumiko won’t accept anything from her family, yet she complains that they won’t accept her. Gran says that she has the ability to change that by changing her attitude. If she wants other people to drop their prejudices, she’s going to have to drop some of hers, too. Gran also references the Civil Rights Movement, which had started by the time this story takes place, and how American society is trying to rid itself of some past prejudices, so learning some tolerance and acceptance is a very American thing for Sumiko to do. Sumiko admits that she never thought of the situation like that. Sumiko takes Gran’s advice to heart, and she has a talk with her grandfather about how she really feels. Sumiko is surprised that he listens to her when she talks to him, but Gentaro really does love his granddaughter and cares about how she feels. The two of them come to an understanding, and Sumiko decides that she can do some things to try to meet her grandfather halfway. Although she still prefers Western-style clothes, Sumiko decides that she can wear kimonos now and then to please her grandfather and try to learn what he has to teach her about her family and culture. It’s about respect, and when Sumiko and her grandfather show that they respect each other and each other’s feelings, their relationship improves. So, why is it that Stephen is so special that he can’t be told that because he’s a boy being a boy?

Mystery of the Green Cat

Mystery of the Green Cat by Phyllis Whitney, 1957.

Things just haven’t been the same for twins Andy and Adrian Dallas since their mother died two years ago. Now, their father has remarried to a woman he met through his work, and Adrian has been having an even harder time coping with it than Andy has. The twins have always been different from each other, not identical in appearance or personal interests, but now, Adrian is frequently angry and moody, and he’s getting on Andy’s nerves.

Their new stepmother, Emily, isn’t bad, and Andy can tell that she’s trying hard to be nice to them so that they’ll like her, but it does make the boys uneasy that their father seems to be having an easier time moving on from their mother’s death than they are. Also, Emily has two daughters, Jill and Carol, who have been living with their grandmother. Now that Emily has remarried, Jill and Carol are coming to live with her, her new husband, and the two boys in San Francisco. Emily has been saying that they’ll all be one big family now, but all of the children have misgivings about it. The twin boys have never lived with girls before, and they’re not looking forward to having a bunch of girly stuff around or Carol practicing her dancing in their new house. Meanwhile, the two girls aren’t sure that they’re really looking forward to suddenly having a couple of brothers. Carol is optimistic and thinks it might be fun, but Jill remembers that she hasn’t gotten along with the brothers of some of her friends. This new blended family is a major adjustment for everyone.

Adrian is so angry and upset about the coming of the girls that he refuses to go meet them at the airport with the rest of the family. Andy goes, although he is uneasy about meeting his new stepsisters, and Jill can tell that he’s not really happy to see them. Andy’s father explains Adrian’s absence by saying that he had a summer school art project to work on, although he does warn Jill that Adrian might need some time to get used to being around girls because he doesn’t make friends easily. Jill bluntly asks if that means that Adrian doesn’t want them around, and her stepfather says that it’s more that Adrian is still mourning his mother and having trouble adjusting to his new stepmother. But, he adds that he and his sons have really been lonely since his first wife’s death, and they’ve really needed someone like Emily in their lives, and he’s sure that Adrian will eventually realize that. He asks Jill, as the oldest girl, if she would try to make friends with Adrian. Jill’s not sure how she’s going to do that if Adrian doesn’t want to be friends with her. (This is a recurring theme in other mystery stories by Phyllis Whitney. The solution usually involves shared experiences binding people together, and this is partly the case in this book, too.)

The Dallas family house is situated on Russian Hill, and as they approach it, Jill’s mother points out another house higher on the hill, which she calls a “mystery house,” knowing that Jill loves mystery books. Her stepfather says that there are two women living there, Mrs. Wallenstein and Miss Furness. The two women are somewhat reclusive, and nobody really seems to know much about them. Andy says that Mrs. Wallenstein is a baroness, but his father says he thinks that’s just a rumor. The two elderly ladies also have a Japanese family working for them. The wife is their cook, and the husband is their gardener. Later, Jill spots someone spying on the Dallas house, peeking down from a wall surrounding their property, and Andy says that’s probably the daughter of the cook and gardener. Andy and Adrian have seen her around before, although they haven’t spoken to her much.

While they’re all sitting at the table, eating and talking, someone suddenly throws a rock through one of their windows. The rock came from the baroness’s house, so the father of the family says he’s going to call her and talk to her about it. However, when he calls, Miss Furness answers the phone, denies that anyone at her house would do such a thing, and hangs up. The boys tell Jill that this isn’t the first time someone has thrown rocks, but the last time, the rock just landed on the terrace and didn’t break anything. The boys haven’t wanted to tell the parents about the last time. Jill asks why not, and Andy refers to a “green cat” but doesn’t really explain what that means.

Later, the Japanese girl from the house next door stops by and introduces herself to Jill as Hana Tamura. (Hana’s English is imperfect, and this is one of those books where the author tries to write like the character is speaking to reflect the accent. Hana switches her ‘r’s and ‘l’s when she speaks in that stereotypical way Asians in old movies speak.) Hana admits to breaking the window and says that she did it by accident. She was just climbing the wall to see the new children who moved in next door when she kicked a stone loose from the wall that broke the window. She offers to pay for the damage. Jill’s mother says that won’t be necessary, but Hana insists that she accept some money. Jill’s mother invites her to stay and visit with Jill and Carol, but Hana says she can’t because Miss Furness doesn’t like her visiting with neighbors. Miss Furness doesn’t seem to like poeple much. Jill is disappointed because she could use a new friend in her new home, and Hana is interesting because she’s the first Japanese person Jill has ever met. (That’s interesting to me because Jill and Carol were originally from New York, and I would think that they’d see all sorts of people there.) Before Hana leaves, Jill asks her if she knows anything about a green cat. Hana refuses to answer, but Jill can tell that she’s a little disturbed at the mention of the cat. Jill’s mother is a little concerned that Hana isn’t being allowed to associate with neighborhood children and says that she’s going to try to talk to Miss Furness about it.

It turns out everyone has completely misunderstood the relationship between Miss Furness and Mrs. Wallenstein (“the baroness”). Rather than Miss Furness being the housekeeper for Mrs. Wallenstein, she’s actually Mrs. Wallenstein’s sister and the head of the household. When Jill spots Mrs. Wallenstein watching her with binoculars, Adrian says that she’s done that before and also finally confides that Mrs. Wallenstein was the one who threw a rock at him and Andy when they were on the terrace, not Hana. The “rock” Mrs. Wallenstein threw was actually just a little pebble, and Andy scooped it up, refusing to even show it to Adrian. After a visit to the house next door to deliver a letter for Mrs. Wallenstein that was accidentally delivered to the Dallas house, Jill comes to realize that Miss Furness doesn’t treat her sister well, reading her mail and keeping people from her, and that Mrs. Wallenstein is in need of help. Andy finally explains to Jill that the rock Mrs. Wallenstein threw had a note tied to it, asking them to help her find her “little green cat.” He didn’t want to tell Adrian before because he didn’t think Adrian would take it seriously. The kids aren’t sure what the “little green cat” is, but both Jill and Andy want to help poor Mrs. Wallenstein.

Miss Furness doesn’t really mean to be mean to her sister, but she is extremely overprotective of her and keeps her isolated from other people because she has been suffering from ill health and memory problems. Mrs. Wallenstein went through hard times in her life after her husband died, and she was badly injured in an earthquake in Japan, which is why she’s now confined to a wheelchair. Sometimes, when Mrs. Wallenstein starts reminiscing about the past, she becomes confused about what’s past and what’s present, and it all begins blending into one. Her sister has been trying to shield her from past traumatic memories, but Mrs. Wallenstein has the feeling that there’s something important that she wants to remember, and she can’t quite figure out what it is. The key to unlocking Mrs. Wallenstein’s memory and learning the truth about the past lies in finding the little green cat.

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.

Themes and My Reaction

Adjustment to changing family situations is a common theme in Phyllis Whitney’s young adult mystery stories, but this one is a little different from most. Most books by Phyllis Whitney are told only from the point of view of a girl, using third person limited. Even when boys play a major part in stories, the focus is usually on the girl. This book is told mostly from Jill’s perspective, but Andy is the one who begins the story, giving some insight into how he and his brother are feeling. Although the boys and girls are separate when the book begins, their feelings toward each other are pretty similar. All of the children are trying to adjust to major changes in their lives and having misgivings about suddenly having new siblings of the opposite sex.

I think it’s also important to point out that, although the story focuses on a blended family, there is no divorce in the story. The two parents who are entering into a second marriage were widowed. This book was written in the 1950s, and in the first half of the 20th century, people didn’t talk about parents getting divorced as much. In children’s books of this time period, single parents and remarriages were usually the result of the death of a parent. It’s not that divorce was never mentioned; it’s just that it wasn’t nearly as prevalent in children’s literature, partly due to the social stigma against divorce at the time. I’ve sometimes thought that, in some ways, it was also probably easier for authors to explain the loss that accompanies a parent’s death, which would not have been the parent’s choice and was just a tragedy that couldn’t be helped, than the reasons why parents would willingly choose not to continue living with each other or why one parent would no longer live with the children. This is different from modern children’s books, where it’s usually more common to see divorced parents than dead ones. In fact, quite a lot of modern children’s books include divorced parents. Both death and divorce involve feelings of grief and loss, but if the loss is from a death that just couldn’t be helped, the author can avoid addressing the painful questions of “why” the separation happened. In real life, the reasons for a divorce can involve complex and sensitive issues that many adults would find difficult to discuss with children, including marital infidelity, emotional neglect, financial problems, addiction, and physical or psychological abuse. There’s never a happy reason for a divorce, so saying that the absent parents in the story died allows authors to skip over all of that. Death is sad, but it’s a little more self-explanatory. Andy and Adrian’s mother died from a long-term illness. There is less social stigma surrounding divorce in modern times, and the prevalence of divorce in society has made it increasingly important to address children’s feelings about divorce in children’s literature, which is why there are now more books about it. That being said, the loss of a parent because of death is something that children still experience today, and the author of this story makes some important points about the feelings that someone can experience when they lose someone close to them.

As Jill gets to know Adrian, she comes to learn some of the reasons why he’s really unhappy. It’s partly because, when they moved to the new house after his dad remarried, he and Andy had to start sharing a room to make room for the two girls. Adrian and Andy have very different interests, and sharing the space has been particularly hard on Adrian. Adrian is a tidy person, and he’s very serious about art. He needs space to work on his artwork, and Andy is messy and likes to hoard pieces and parts for building things. Jill starts making friends with Adrian when she figures out how to make a better working space for him, but she upsets him again when she accidentally breaks the vase holding his brushes, which reveals the second reason why Adrian is unhappy. When the family moved to the new house, his father got rid of many of the things that used to belong to his first wife. Adrian has been blaming his stepmother for the loss of many of these sentimental reminders. Adrian doesn’t have many reminders of his mother left, and the vase was one of them, so now he blames Jill and her mother for the loss of that. As all the little reminders of his mother seem to be disappearing and Emily and her daughters are moving into the space, Adrian is afraid of losing all of the memories he has of his mother. It’s a situation that’s somewhat similar to Mrs. Wallenstein’s problem, using physical objects as a reminder of the past.

Mrs. Wallenstein has suffered sadness and trauma, which is part of the reason why her memory is so faulty. However she badly wants to remember some of the things she’s forgotten since her injury in the earthquake because they hold the key to the truth about her husband’s death. He died or disappeared under mysterious circumstances, and his partner was murdered. Some people claimed that her husband might have actually killed his partner, but Mrs. Wallenstein doesn’t believe that. The clues to what really happened are tied up with the mysterious green cat.

However, part of the story also involves selfishness and self-centeredness. Mrs. Wallenstein’s husband’s business partner was a very selfish man, always needing to be the center of attention and taking credit for things that Mrs. Wallenstein’s husband did, and that’s tied in with the story of what happened to the two of them. In his own way, Adrian is selfish, too. It’s true that he’s still grieving for his mother, but the way he shows his grief is selfish, and Jill finally tells him so. Just because his stepmother isn’t his mother is no reason for him to be constantly cold and rude to her. Adrian is also rude and inconsiderate to other people, including Jill, their new friend Hana, and his own brother. Each of them is also dealing with something hard in their lives, but all Adrian cares about are his own feelings. While they all tiptoe around him, trying to make friends with him and be extra careful of his feelings because he’s “sensitive”, he says rude and condescending things to them or suddenly goes into a moody pout if he’s reminded of his mother’s death and/or his father’s remarriage. As Jill says, he’s sensitive, but only about himself; Adrian has no sensitivity for anyone else’s feelings. He’s even careless with Mrs. Wallenstein’s green cat after he learns that it has no monetary value, not considering what it means to her and her past. For someone who’s hyper-aware of belongings that have meaning for him, it’s an incredibly selfish thing to do. He not only doesn’t try to help the others solve the mystery of the cat, but when he finds out some information on his own, he deliberately doesn’t tell them until he can show off how clever he is while taunting the others about how they’re not as clever as they think they are. I honestly thought that he was going to be more help to the others in the story and reconcile his feelings through their shared adventure, but only Andy does that. Adrian resists right up until the very end, when Emily has a very honest talk with him about his feelings and hers.

I was a little annoyed at the way Hana’s speech was shown in the book because it always annoys me a little when authors try to show someone’s accent through spelling because it often seems to detract from what characters are actually saying, and the r/l swapping when Asians speak has a stereotypical feel to it. It’s not that Asians in real life never do the r/l swap, but it’s usually way overdone when it appears in books and movies, so it gets on my nerves. The real life r/l phenomenon is really based on the fact that Asian languages have a tendency to use the same symbol to represent r/l sounds, and the sound those symbols represent is about halfway between the two, depending on the language. In that case, it’s not really so much “swapping” the sounds as making one sound that is more in the middle than English speakers are used to hearing. The speaker may not actually be hearing the difference if they’re not accustomed to thinking of a difference between those two sounds, while listeners who are accustomed to listening for a difference in those sounds are confused about which of the two sounds they’re actually hearing when someone makes a sound that’s kind of between the two.

That being said, the perceptions of Asians, particularly Japanese people, in the book is favorable. This book was published about 12 years after WWII, so I thought it was nice that the characters were looking at the Japanese characters favorably. Jill is genuinely interested in being Hana’s friend, and Jill’s mother wants Jill to be friends with Hana. Later, Hana tells Jill and the boys a little about her own history, how her parents were married before WWII, but because her mother was unsure about coming to the United States, she ended up staying in Japan without her husband for a time. Hana was born shortly before the war started, and her father was unable to come to see her or bring his wife and child to the United States during the war. In fact, Hana and her mother were only reunited with her father a year before the story starts, so she was 13 years old the first time she met her father. Although the other children in the story have had their share of loss and family problems, Hana’s story about her own life helps to highlight that other people have their troubles, too.

The author, Phyllis A. Whitney, spent the first 15 years of her life in Asia because her father worked for an export business. She was actually born in Japan and also lived for a time in China and the Philippines. Because of all of the travel in her early life, Phyllis Whitney’s books often include travel to various countries around the world, people from different cultures, and children getting used to new homes or living among unfamiliar people, for various reasons.

There are some interesting tidbits of information about Asian cultures in the story, particularly about Japanese culture. I thought the part about how Japanese traditionally calculate age was interesting. There are also some interesting pieces of information about San Francisco and its landmarks. I’d heard of Telegraph Hill before, but I didn’t know the origin of the name until the book explained it.

I liked the book, both for the interesting tidbits of information and for the plot itself. This mystery is one of what I think of as the “mysterious circumstances” type of mystery. That’s a name I made up to describe mysteries where no crime (or at least no obvious crime) has been committed but yet there’s evidence of strange happenings and unknown events that must be figured out. I honestly wasn’t sure what direction this story was going to take when it started out, and I changed my mind several times along the way, but it has a very satisfying ending.

Da Vinci

Da Vinci by Mike Venezia, 1989.

This book is part of a series of biographies of famous people from history. I’ve been familiar with the part of this series about famous artists since around the time the first ones were published. I was in elementary school school at the time, and we had the books because my mother used to teach the Art Masterpiece program at the school. She would come to class and talk about famous artists and show their paintings, and there would be an art project for the kids to do based on the style or subject matter of the artists. So, when I was young, we had books from this series (among other art books) around the house that she used for the art classes and a lot of arts and crafts materials (a tradition which exists to this day). At the moment, this is the only book from the series that I have because the book about Leonardo da Vinci was my favorite.

Leonardo da Vinci was one of the most famous artists of the Italian Renaissance, particularly known for his paintings The Last Supper and the Mona Lisa, but he was more than just a painter. The book is full of interesting facts about his life as well as his work. Aside from showing photographs of da Vinci’s work, the book also has humorous cartoons about da Vinci’s life, which is one of the things that makes this series of books fun.

Leonardo began showing an interest and talent for drawing while he was still a child. Throughout his life, he also developed and practiced many other skills, including architecture and mathematics, music, and sculpture. He was a scientist and inventor, experimenting in many different areas, from the mixing of different types of paints to weapons design. Along the way, he found creative ways to combine his various interests. He used his drawing skills to develop his scientific ideas, and he used his knowledge of science to make his art appear more realistic.

You might wonder how one person could find so much time to do so much, but part of the answer is that he didn’t finish everything he did. He is known to have left some of his work unfinished, possibly because he got distracted by other, more interesting projects and pursuits or because he just couldn’t finish them to his satisfaction. Not all of his designs for inventions really came to anything, and not all of his experiments worked out, either. Some of his paintings are now deteriorating because the experimental paints that he mixed didn’t quite work out.

However, Leonardo da Vinci was a perfectionist, and the paintings that he did complete show excellent techniques and a high degree of realism that have been an inspiration to later artists for centuries.

One final thing I’d like to add is that this book is part of the reason I thought The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown was a dumb book. As I said, I grew up with art lessons. I read and loved this book about Leonardo da Vinci when I was a kid, and it has some very basic information about the life and work of Leonardo da Vinci that anybody who was seriously interested in him really should know. One of the cringiest parts of The Da Vinci Code for me was the part where our heroes are stupidly trying to figure out a message that is simply written backward. As this picture book about Leonard da Vinci points out, it’s common knowledge these days that da Vinci wrote notes using mirror writing. Some people, like the book suggests, think that he did that to make his notes harder for other people to read, although there’s also a theory that he did it because he was left-handed and that he decided that it was easier for a left-handed person to write that way. Left-handed people often complain about getting ink on their hands when they write left-to-right, but they don’t have that problem if they write right-to-left, so this might have been his attempt to get around the problem of ink-stained hands. Either way, if the people in The Da Vinci Code were such experts, they should have know this about da Vinci, and it should have been one of the first things they should have checked for. That’s not the only problem in The Da Vinci Code, but it’s one of the ones that rankled me the most because of how long I’ve known about this. (Also, The Da Vinci Code totally ripped off the albino assassin from Foul Play with Chevy Chase and Goldie Hawn, but that’s another issue.)

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.

Famous French Painters

Famous French Painters by Roland J. McKinney, 1960.

This book is part of a series of Famous Biographies for Young People. Reading older non-fiction books can be problematic because non-fiction books are often updated with new information. In this particular book, there are people who are described as being still alive because they were at the time of the book’s publication, but they are not alive anymore. However, older non-fiction books sometimes interest me both because they are an indication of what people knew and studied at the time of publication and they sometimes cover odd topics that don’t commonly appear in new books. So far, this is the only book I own from this particular series, but the other biographies in the series

It begins with a section of black-and-white prints of famous French paintings and an introduction to the history of French painting in general. The introduction begins with a discussion of illuminated manuscripts in the 15th century and the artistic and architectural endeavors promoted by King Francis I in the 16th century. Francis I was particularly fascinated by Italian art, and he hired artists of the Italian Renaissance, including Leonardo da Vinci, to work at his court. Francis I helped to fuel an increasing interest in the arts in France called the French Renaissance. Although the French Renaissance was initially heavily influenced by the Italian Renaissance, French artists continued to develop their own styles. Popular subjects in French art were portraits, realistic landscapes, scenes from Classical mythology, and religious themes. The introduction ends with artists who painted during the late 18th century and early 19th century, explaining how their departure from neoclassical styles led to the development of new art styles.

After the introduction, there is a series of short biographies of famous French artists, beginning in the early 19th century and leading into the early 20th century. One of the first things that struck me about the list of artists included in the book is that, when their birth and death dates are included, none of the artists were born later than the 1880s, and the last two in the book have no death dates listed. Since the book was published in 1960, those last two artists were still alive at the time of publication, although they have died since then.

The artists included in the book are:

Eugene Delacroix (1798-1863) – He was a leader in the Romantic style of painting and one of the first French artists to use watercolor paints, which the French learned from English artists.

J. B. (Jean Baptiste) Camille Corot (1796-1875) – Originally, he trained in business, but he didn’t think he was suited to business and decided that his future was in art. He was particularly known for his landscapes, which were his specialty. He was also known as a charitable benefactor.

Edouard Manet (1832-1883) – Manet’s parents originally wanted him to become a lawyer, but it soon became apparent that he did not have the interest or temperament for a law career. When he first began his art studies, he quarreled with his teacher over the teacher’s strict insistence on realism in art because Manet preferred a more creative form of expression. He eventually developed a more simplified realistic style that did not focus on small details, a style that contributed to the development of impressionism.

Edgar Hilaire Germain Degas (1834-1917) – His specialty was portraits, and following the lessons that his teacher impressed on him, he emphasizes the importance of lines and drawing in his work. Much of his work was in oil paint, but he switched to pastels because he found that it was easier to work with and less of a strain on his eyes. Some of his best known works were of ballet dancers.

Paul Cezanne (1839-1906) – He initially doubted his own artistic talents, but a fellow painter, Pissarro, advised him to stop trying to imitate others and put his focus on studying nature. Cezanne’s association with Pissarro helped him to develop his own style.

Pierre Auguste Renoir (1841-1919) – Early in his life, Renoir was known for his singing ability, but his parents insisted that he learn a trade. He started learning how to decorate china, but this was the era when factories began using machines to decorate china. For a time, Renoir decorated fans and window shades, but his focus on improving his drawing abilities led him to a career in art. He became a friend of Monet, and the two would discuss art techniques with each other, although they had different styles.

Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890) – He was originally from the Netherlands but lived in France. He was a contemporary of Gauguin, and the two were even friends. Unfortunately, van Gogh was plagued by mental illness, leading to the fit where he cut off part of his ear after an argument sparked by ridicule from Gauguin. Eventually, he committed suicide. He was not a famous artist during his lifetime, partly due to his mental illness and early death, but his work became famous after his death.

Paul Gauguin (1848-1903) – Although he was originally from France, Gauguin is known for his travels to islands in the South Pacific, where he eventually died. Much of his work was inspired by his travels in the South Pacific.

Henri Matisse (1869-1954) – He was a leading figure in a group of artists known as the fauves, which mean “wild beasts.” They painted in an unorthodox way that included few details and ignored perspective.

Pablo Picasso (1881- ) – Picasso was originally from Spain, but he lived in France for most of his adult life. He began studying art at a young age and is known for his work in surrealism and cubism. He was alive at the time this book was written, but he died in 1973.

(Odd fact not included in the book – Picasso was actually born one day before the shootout at the OK Corral in Tombstone, AZ. It doesn’t mean anything and isn’t important, but I noticed the date and just thought I’d tell you.)

Georges Braque (1882- ) – Braque was a contemporary of Picasso, and the two artists were instrumental in the development of cubism, although they each did their own work. The collaboration between the two artists was interrupted by the outbreak of WWI. Braque was alive at the time this book was written, but he passed away in 1963. On the subject of limitations in art, he once said, “Progress in art does not lie in extending its limits, but in knowing them better.”

Something that struck me was how much artists who were contemporaries of each other worked together, met to discuss and analyze each other’s art, and were actual friends. I prefer collaboration to competition, and I like that many of these artists seemed to appreciate and learn from each other’s skills and techniques.

I was also surprised at the number of artists whose parents initially wanted them to become lawyers, like Manet, Degas, Cezanne, and Matisse.

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.

The First Book of Painting

The First Book of Paintings by Lamont Moore, 1960.

This book is meant to be a beginner’s introduction to understanding and appreciating paintings. I thought it was interesting how, in the book’s introduction, it points out that the word “art” is based on the Latin word for “skill.” Art work is skilled work, and it explains how other types of skills are referred to as “arts.” Artists are people who are skilled at making things, but they also have an ability to see things more clearly than most people, form strong mental images, and convey those mental images and their feelings about them through their art.

The book is divided into sections that focus on different elements of paintings and artistic principles, explaining their role in art and providing examples of their use. The elements of paintings are line, shape, space, light, and color. The artistic principles covered in the book are pattern, balance, rhythm, contrast, and unity. Some of these sections also include suggested activities for readers to try that demonstrate these concepts.

Line – The lines of a painting define shapes in the painting. They also convey the idea of movement and direct the eyes of the viewer to important points of interest. This section shows a cave drawing a rhinoceros and suggests that readers trace it onto another piece of paper but change some of the lines to see the difference it makes.

Shape – Shapes are defined by lines. Shapes are flat, but their placement can create the illusion of depth and distance. The book suggests studying shape in drawing by drawing a friend’s silhouette.

Space – Shapes occupy and fill space. The placement of shapes within space create balance and suggest depth.

Light – Light is used to create the illusion of three-dimensional shapes because physical objects have sides that reflect light and cast shadow. It can also be used to give viewers a sense of substance because metal objects in paintings should look particularly reflective. Lighting can also convey mood in a painting. Part of this section explains how impressionists use light to give paintings more of an appearance of depth when viewed at a distance.

Color – The colors help to convey the mood of the painting. Certain colors also look better in combination with each other.

Pattern – Patterns are repeated features, like repeated shapes, lines, colors, and/or repeated light and dark spaces. Patterns can be used turn a few simple elements into part of a larger concept.

Balance – The concept of balance means that elements of a painting should balance each other, like placements of shapes and objects, points of interest, and areas of dark and light colors. If elements are out of balance, it can unsettle the viewers and give them the impression that something is wrong and needs to be fixed.

Rhythm – Rhythm in a painting suggests movement and energy, like the subjects of a painting are alive and moving.

Contrast – Contrast in a painting creates visual interest. If the elements of a painting are too much alike, they can look dull. The contrast could be in the placement and grouping of elements in the picture (such as some objects in the picture being grouped while others are isolated) or contrast between light and dark elements, making some of them stand out from others.

Unity – Unity refers to how well all of the elements of a painting combine to form a whole. All of the previously listed aspects of a painting need to work together effectively to convey the subject of the painting and the mood and message of the artist.

One of the things I like about this book is that is uses a wide selection of paintings from different countries and time periods as its examples, from cave paintings and paintings on Grecian pottery to Renaissance portraits and modern art.

At first, when I was reading the book, I was annoyed that almost all of the pictures of paintings in the book are black-and-white. Then, I discovered that the pictures in the chapter about the use of color in paintings are full color. That is the only place in the book (aside from the cover) where there are color images. I think the reason why they did that is to draw attention to the colors in that chapter while emphasizing other aspects of painting in the other chapters, but I think I would still prefer more color images throughout the book.

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.

The FunCraft Book of Print and Paint

The FunCraft Book of Print & Paint by Heather Amery and Anne Civardi, 1976.

This is the American edition of a British book, and it’s part of a series of craft and activity books. When I was a kid, I was really into crafts, but I didn’t do even half of the crafts in the craft books we had. This particular book is interesting because I first thought that it was going to be about painting pictures, and it is, but it’s specifically about making “prints” with paint. Basically, the crafts involve using various objects, from leaves and veggies to your own hands and fingers as stamps to make pictures and designs.

I remember once taking part in an activity at our local library that involved making pictures with stamps make from cut potatoes, like the book shows in the section about vegetable prints. Our potato stamps weren’t as elaborate as the ones shown here, and it’s interesting that they thought of using other veggies to get some different shapes as well.

The range of objects and techniques that the book uses in making prints is also interesting. It points out that you can make some interesting patterns by painting on a page and folding it over or using string coated in paint to make swirls. There are tips for making using tools like stencils and rollers to make designs.

The book also includes some painting techniques, like how to mix colors, and some tips for how to enhance pictures you’ve made, like painting over parts of a picture with glue and then shaking on some powdered colors. It gives suggestions for different powdered colors, like colored sand, salt, or sugar or using powdered spices or cocoa from your kitchen (more expensive, but it will give your artwork a scent).

One of my favorite suggestions was a technique that I did like a lot when I was a kid, making scratch pictures with a simple form of sgraffito. You can buy kits and specially prepared paper for doing this today, which didn’t exist when I was a kid (at least, not anywhere where I could buy it). Instead, I had to do it the old-fashioned way, using the technique in this book – drawing a rainbow of colors on paper, covering of it with black, and then scratching the black off to make rainbow pictures and patterns.

There are too many tips and techniques for me to cover everything in detail. The last few pages cover uses of the techniques for specific projects, how to make prints on cloth, and how to have an exhibition of the pictures you’ve made.

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.

Drawing Fun

Drawing Fun by Carolyn Davis and Charlene Brown, 1988.

This book is part of the Beginners Art Series, and it teaches children basic drawing skills. The book is designed for readers to try out drawing techniques on their own as they read along and starts with a page that explains the materials they will need.

Because this is a beginning guide, the book begins by explaining that all objects and, therefore, all drawings, are made up of basic shapes. One of the keys to learning how to draw is studying the basic shapes and how they can be combined to create more complex shapes and drawings.

When beginning to draw, the reader should begin by sketching out the general shapes that make up what they’re drawing and then fill in the details.

Many of the drawing activities in the book focus on tracing shapes, drawings, and photos to learn how they are formed and practice drawing skills.

As the book continues, the techniques become more advanced and the drawings become more detailed. It gradually teaches readers how to use shadows and shading to make their drawings appear more realistic and three-dimensional. The subject matter of the drawing exercises ranges from basic apples to more interesting subjects, like teddy bears and people.

The book also explains how to use perspective in drawing to further add a three-dimensional quality.

I like this book because I think it’s a good introduction to a fun, artistic hobby, giving readers good beginning techniques.

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.

Patty Paints a Picture

Patty Paints a Picture by Laura Bannon, 1946.

Patty wants to paint a picture of her kitten, Happy, to hang in her room. However, she has trouble creating a painting that truly satisfies her. Her first attempt doesn’t really look like her kitten. Patty is taking an art class at a local museum, and her mother suggests that she take her picture of Happy to her teacher and ask her how to make it better. Through Patty’s efforts to paint a realistic picture of her kitten, she comes to learn more about art.

Patty’s teacher suggests that Patty actually bring her kitten to class so that everyone can observe and paint him. When Patty takes her kitten to her art class, the whole class looks at Happy, pointing out parts of the the cat, like his whiskers and his little padded feet with retractable claws. Every part of Happy, including the shape of his eyes and his powerful back legs that are good for jumping, is suited to making him a good hunter because cats often hunt for their food. Studying the form of the cat helps the children understand how to draw him.

The fun part of the book is when Patty studies all of the different ways her friends in class draw the kitten, seeing how everyone looks at the kitten differently and uses different art styles, some drawn better than others because all the artists are children. The children’s pictures in the book look like pictures that would be painted by real children.

The children in the art class paint the cat in different ways and different imagined settings, indoors and outdoors, depending on their interests and how they see the cat and his personality. The boy who drew Happy in a cartoon style, with a bird in his stomach and a caption, wants to be a cartoonist, which is why his style was a good choice for his painting. Patty, on the other hand, wants her painting to be realistic for the way she sees her kitten.

The book explains how Patty learns new art techniques to make her painting look more realistic. She studies the lines that people use in their paintings and compare them to her cat, seeing that curved lines for the cat’s body make him look more realistic. Patty’s teacher points out that one of the mistakes that she’s made in her first efforts is giving Happy a body more the size of an adult cat than a kitten. A kitten’s body looks smaller when compared to the size of the head. To make her picture more realistic, Patty has to learn to draw her kitten’s body parts and features in the right proportions. Patty also notices that the edges of another girl’s cat painting look fuzzy because she’s painting in watercolor and the edges of her painting and wet and running. Patty likes the fuzziness of that painting, so she decides to use that technique on purpose to make more realistic, fuzzy fur. Her teacher shows her how to use that technique with more control by putting a wet blotter under her paper. I like how the book describes Patty’s observations of both her kitten and other people’s pictures and how she uses them to improve her own painting.

At one point in the story, Happy disappears from the art class, and Patty is afraid that she’s lost her kitten forever. Fortunately, she finds Happy hiding in the art room, taking a nap, and he is fine.

In the end, Patty produces a painting that satisfies her because it really looks like her kitten, the way she sees him.

This is one of those vintage children’s books that I would like to see in print again! It’s a nice story, and I really liked the way the book examines the different ways that people look at art and the styles they use. There’s no wrong way to paint something, but the book explains how learning different techniques can help artists to express themselves and their vision the way they want. Patty knows when she’s doing well at her painting when the picture she paints looks more like the vision she has of her kitten.

You can read this book online in your browser through the HathiTrust Digital Library.

Bird Wise

Bird Wise by Pamela M. Hickman, illustrations by Judie Shore, 1988.

This is a beginning guide to birds and bird watching for kids. I thought that the guide was very helpful with nice, detailed illustrations. The book explains the appearance, biology, and lives of birds and offers activities to help readers understand and interact with birds.

The first section in the book is about the appearance and body parts of birds. It explains how different birds have differently-shaped beaks and feet and different types of feathers and how the differences help each type of bird eat the foods they like and live in the places where they live. One of the activities for this section is about how to start a feather collection. The book also explains that different birds have different styles of flying.

The section about how birds live explain about different types of bird nests and how they migrate and raise their young. The book explains different methods for making bird feeders and bird houses.

The book profiles certain specific types of birds, including owls (there is an activity about dissecting owl pellets, which I had to do when I was in elementary school), gulls, hummingbirds, and woodpeckers.

In the section about bird watching, the book offers tips for what to look for to identify a bird’s type. It also explains how to make bird blinds to avoid being seen and how to recognize types of bird songs.

The book also contains other helpful information, like how to care for injured birds and how to plant a garden that will attract birds. It also includes a board game that emphasizes some of the lessons about birds in the book.

Overall, I was pleased with the range of information in the book. It was interesting and well-presented.

The book is available to borrow and read for free online through Internet Archive.


Starlings by Wilfred S. Bronson, 1948.

The title of the book tells you what it’s about; this is a children’s picture book about starlings. That sounds pretty straight-forward and even a little dull, but there is more to learn about starlings than I imagined, and the author of this book has an imaginative way of explaining information. I love books that cover odd topics in detail, and I enjoyed the whimsical quality of this book. The pictures are detailed black-and-white drawings, some with captions like comics. Most of them explain the anatomy of the birds or their habits, but they have some unique ways of expressing educational information.

The book begins by describing the singing of starlings and then explains how farmers view starlings. Starlings can be a pest to farmers when they eat their fruit or the seeds the farmers are trying to plant, but they can also be helpful when they eat weed seeds and prevent weeds from coming up in the farmers’ fields. Of course, the birds don’t know when they’re helping or hindering because, as far as they’re concerned, they’re just there to eat any food that happens to be available at the moment. I like the little picture of the bird reading a mystery book, trying to figure out why farmers don’t mind when they eat some seeds and try to scare them away from others. That’s an example of the whimsy I was talking about.

The book continues describing what starlings eat and places where they like to roost, and it explains how they affect people living in cities (mainly, messing up their cars). There were times when people in cities considered them such a nuisance that they would shoot them, and some poor people hunted them for food. Actually, the entire reason why we have starlings in the US is that people over-hunted other types of birds (there is a disturbing picture of hunters with piles of dead birds at one point in the book), and birds are an important part of the ecosystem. Even though they can annoy farmers when they eat seeds and fruit, they also eat bugs that are pests to crops.

I was really struck by the passage that explained how starlings were first brought to the United States and why they were brought here:

“Some people think that starlings have no right to food or nesting-places because they are not ‘American birds.’ Yet all the starlings you see were born in America. So were their parents and grandparents and great-great-grandparents and all their relatives clear back to 1890. In that year their ancestors were caught in Europe and brought in cages to America. So many American birds had been killed at that time by our own ancestors that our crops were growing wormier and wormier each year, while insect pests grew worse and worse. So starlings were imported to help us fight the insects. They were freed in Central Park in New York City and left to look out for themselves.”

This explanation uses simplified language for children, and it also oddly evokes imagery of human beings. We don’t normally refer to animals as “foreigners” because animals don’t have speak different human languages or have allegiances to foreign governments like people from other countries do. When we talk about new species that have been introduced to an environment where they did not originally belong and quickly spread out and multiple, we usually call them “invasive species.” In that case, the ecological concern is that the new invasive species will disrupt the balance of the natural environment and crowd out native species, but what the author is trying to point out that the situation with the starlings was different. The starlings were introduced to the environment in the US on purpose, not by accident, and it was done specifically because they were meant to a solution to a problem. The environment had already been disrupted by humans who had moved into areas where they had not lived previously and where they killed too many of the native species themselves without regard to what that would do to the natural environment and their own farming. The introduction of the starlings was meant to restore a balance that had been lost. However, the people who had originally caused the problem didn’t see it that way, seeing the starlings as pests because they were “foreign.” While birds in general may occasionally be a nuisance because they don’t understand human priorities, they still perform useful functions for human beings as they go about their lives, just being the birds they are – eating annoying weed seeds and bugs and scavenging food from what humans throw out.

“People who think that starlings should be starvelings because they are ‘foreigners’ should remember that these American-born birds save much of what they themselves throw away and are still helping us to fight insects as they did in 1890.”

I understand what the author is trying to explain about balance in the ecological system, but I was struck by the human imagery that the passage evokes: “Foreigners” who came to New York City, not unlike immigrants fresh off the boat from Ellis Island during the 19th century, set free to make their way in a strange environment among people who often regarded them as worthless pests, disliking them while still using the useful services they provided. The comparison still fascinates me. At first, I wasn’t sure that the author meant to make that broader comparison here. I thought he probably used that language just to simply the ecological concepts for children’s understanding, but the author does make another comparison a little further on:

“So let’s be fair. If American-born starlings are foreigners, then so are all people in America except the Indians (Native Americans). So are many kinds of birds, animals, and plants. Our ancestors brought them here from other countries. But if all these creatures, and ourselves, are American now, then so are the starlings. Yes indeed!”

So get off your high horse, starling-haters.

At several points in the book, the author compares birds to airplanes, explaining their muscles and flying mechanisms like machinery. I liked the page where the author compares different planes and helicopters to types of birds (cruisers being like gliding eagles and albatrosses, fast-turning speed planes like starlings and swallows, and hovering helicopters like humming birds). The parts that describe how birds cling to branches as they sleep and how their wings move look accurate and helpful. The part about how a bird creates eggs is hilarious. The text about the formation of the egg inside the bird isn’t bad. It completely skips over the subject of the fertilization of eggs (understandably), and the picture show the bird as a kind of egg-making factory with little men assembling the parts of the egg in stages instead of showing a bird’s reproductive anatomy.

In the upper right corners of this section of the book, there are little squares with a flying bird because part of the book is meant to be uses as a flip book to see a bird flying. The page shown above with the boy flipping through the book shows how to use the flip book portion.

There is a section of the book that explains how baby birds develop in the egg and eventually hatch.

There is also a section in the book the shows how adult starlings will prepare a nest for their eggs and how they raise their babies.

As I was reading the book, I wondered who the author, Wilfred S. Bronson, was. Bronson was an artist specializing in natural history, and he wrote and illustrated other books for children about animals and natural history. In the years before he wrote this particular book, he served in the US Army during World War I and painted murals for the Works Progress Administration (WPA) during the Great Depression. He also participated in expeditions to gather specimens and create illustrations of wildlife for botanical gardens and museums.

I haven’t found a copy of this particular book to read online, but it was republished in 2008 and is still available from Amazon.